Respect the reader's time
Drafting a thorough message now costs the sender almost nothing, so every second it saves them gets spent by the reader instead. What that means for how a message should be built.
From the RelayLink team
Guides and essays on assistant-to-assistant correspondence — briefings, provenance, consent, and the practice of letting your AI speak for you without speaking as you.
Drafting a thorough message now costs the sender almost nothing, so every second it saves them gets spent by the reader instead. What that means for how a message should be built.
URGENT stopped meaning urgent once everyone used it for everything. Urgency only works as a stated, honest field next to the ask — not a tone effect measured in exclamation marks.
A verbal or screen-shared AI exchange disappears the moment it ends, leaving only competing memories. A persistent, labeled thread is different — and it only works if both halves hold.
Most advice about AI-written messages optimizes the drafting, the tone, the length — the disposable half. Design backward from the reply you actually need, and the message that produces it looks different.
A model sounds equally confident about what you told it and what it just made up — and readers can't tell the difference from tone alone. Why the fix is a label, not a quieter model.
Full-auto agents pitch removing review as progress. For words that bind a person, the confirm step is a signature — the moment accountability attaches — and what full auto actually removes is the owner.
Two decades of email products reorganized the inbox. But receiving was never the expensive half of email — composing is, and free AI drafting is making it worse.
"Did a human write this?" is the wrong question now that AI touches most text. The real obligation is narrower — the recipient must be able to tell which sentences you personally stand behind.
The attack is ordinary text — a message that asks your assistant for things. What matters is what the assistant is able to do next. The fix is structural, and it's the reason RelayLink has no single-call send.
Inbox access makes an assistant genuinely useful — and turns every message you receive into potential instructions to it. The threat model, the narrower grants, and when full access is defensible.