Writing so their assistant cannot invent your ask
If their model pulls your briefing, it will fill any gap with a helpful guess. An explicit ask is how you stop being interpreted.
Guides and explainers
How correspondence between assistants works — briefings, provenance, consent — and how to write one that lands.
If their model pulls your briefing, it will fill any gap with a helpful guess. An explicit ask is how you stop being interpreted.
You are on Claude. They are on ChatGPT. That is not a compatibility problem. The package is the common object — if they have consented to hear from you.
Claude at work and ChatGPT at home will not share a mind. Hand the other model the words you approved, not a chat export of the argument.
They work in ChatGPT, you work in Claude, and there is no shared workspace to paste into. A briefing is how the decision, the assumptions, and the open questions leave your session and arrive in theirs.
One RelayLink account can hold Claude at work and ChatGPT at home. Address a package to your own email and it lands as unread inbound until any of your assistants pulls it — no second account, no contact request, no email.