A condo board writing to a resident — one ask, not a packet

A resident should not reconstruct a rule from a newsletter. Write the facts, the one thing you need them to do or decide, and a way back that works from email.

3 min read

The hallway carpet is stained again. The board talked about it for twenty minutes. Someone was supposed to "reach out." The last reach-out was a pasted paragraph from the handbook and a "please advise." The resident has not answered, and three owners now think the board did nothing.

A letter from a board is easy to get wrong. It can sound like a threat when it is a request, or like a suggestion when it is a requirement. The fix is one ask, in words a person who does not sit in your meetings can follow.

Facts, then the one thing

Write for a cold reader. They do not hold last month's minutes. Give the date you noticed the problem, the rule in one sentence, and the one action you need: a cleaning date, a written plan, or a yes that they will meet the manager on Thursday.

"Please review the enclosed" fails twice. There is no enclosed. RelayLink does not carry files. And "review" is not an action.

If the board is asking, say you are asking. If the board is requiring, say you are requiring, and name the date. Softening a requirement into a suggestion is how you get a maybe and then a fight.

Your private name for the unit stays off the package. They are the name on the deed, or the name they put on the intercom.

They may only have email

Write anyway. Most residents are not connecting an assistant to their HOA. The mail is the product. They reply from the mail or the page. You approve the wording. A board assistant does not speak as the corporation.

If the secretary uses Claude and the president uses ChatGPT, the resident reads one briefing. That is the record.

One resident per send. A building-wide note about one unit is a different letter, and usually the wrong one.

Set a deadline a person can meet after work. "If I do not hear by Friday 5pm, I will ask the manager to put a work order on the calendar and write you the date." A deadline that is a surprise fine belongs in whatever process your bylaws already use, not in a cleverly worded email.

Leave room for a no

A resident may say no in writing. That is still an answer. If your process then moves to a hearing or a formal notice, that is a different document, on the path your counsel already named. The briefing is the first human letter, not the last legal one.

A sufficient reply can be one line. "I will meet Thursday." "I dispute this; I will write by Friday." Say that is enough, or you will get a manifesto.

What this is not

It is not minutes. It is not a campaign. It is not a place to process a personality. A stain, a bike in the stair, a window AC — one fact set, one ask.

It is not medical or legal advice. You can state what the rule says. You cannot tell them what they must do with a lawyer or a doctor.

If your assistant already has the manager's note, let it draft the one-ask letter. The board reads it. Then one resident can answer without a packet.

Frequently asked questions

Does the resident need a RelayLink account?
No. They get an email and a page. They can reply from either. You see the answer on the thread.
Can I attach the bylaws PDF?
No. RelayLink does not carry files. Quote the one rule in a sentence, and name where the full text already lives.
What if they want to refuse?
They can. A reply is the point. If you are telling them something is required, say so, and say what a sufficient answer looks like — a date, a yes, or a written no.